Until 31 July 2010, callers to the former number 0870 608 2 608, (and the former minicom number) get a message advising them to phone the new number.
Each Traveline region has put in place a plan for changing the number in literature, on bus stop flags, on vehicles and on the web. These plans should continue to have regard to:
0871 200 22 33
Calls cost 10p per minutes plus any charges your network provider makes.
Most telephone suppliers recharge calls in this range at 10p and it is a constant charge throughout the day. However call set up charges vary and whether calls are rounded up to the minute has to be taken into account. The following illustrates the kind of variations found (27/08/2009) on the providers' websites or Magenta.co.uk and therefore the difficulty of correctly advising those who will use the service:
|
PhonepayPlus, the phone-paid services regulator, as of 1 August 2009, is the organisation which has responsibility for the day to day regulation of 0871 telephone numbers.
The PhonepayPlus code of conduct includes the following additional requirements which Traveline is considering:
A PhonepayPlus news alert refers to research which highlights significant consumer concerns around price transparency and the time some consumers are having to wait on the line before being connected to a service. Providers now have to comply with rules that ensure that the price of the call is made clear and that, if there is to be a delay, the consumer should be able to make an informed decision as to whether to stay on the line.
The clearest wording comes from an exercise carried out by the ATCO Information and Ticketing group in the North West:
"10p per minute plus any charges your network provider makes"
If the context requires it "Calls cost..." can be added:
"Calls cost 10p per minute plus any charges your network provider makes"
These statements rely on separating out the core charge of 10p per minute which applies to all providers, from any decision the network provider makes on what rate to charge it out to the user or what additional charges to levy.
This is a principle used in wording from PhonepayPlus. They recommend the statement:
"Calls cost 10p per minute plus network extras".
It is difficult to see how this fully meets the objectives of being easy to understand given that most people would not know that network extras includes call set up charges and the varying costs of mobile phones and some networks.
Another suggested wording comes from text suggested by the Advertising Standards Authority:
* Calls provided by BT will be charged at 10 pence per minute at all times. A call set-up fee of 9.05 pence per call applies to calls from residential lines. Mobile and other providers' charges may vary
Or the shortened version:
* BT callers charged 10p per min plus 9.05p set-up fee per call. Mobile and other providers' charges vary
The problem with these texts from ASA/CAP are that they are long, they need to be changed every time BT change their call set up charges, they are difficult to display prominently, they do not cover BT business customers and they do not give costing information for calls from non BT providers, other than to say that they may vary.
Where the Traveline telephone number is quoted as a source of information rather than a marketing communication then it may be best not to put charging information. The reasons to be taken into account are:
ASA/CAP have advised that they do not consider a bus stop flag to be advertising (advised from Rupa Pattni to Tony Ferguson on 15 May 2007). Graphics are available that can be used to display the Traveline telephone number on bus flags.
OFCOM advise (Clive Hillier to Tony Ferguson, 15 May 2007) "that it would be reasonable for Traveline to quote the pricing information on the bus stop timetable and only the telephone number on the bus stop flag, given that the print would be too small to read on the flag."
Premium rate services which do not generally cost more than 50 pence are exempt from all PhonepayPlus requirements on pricing information.however this is not relevant to Traveline as PhonePayPlus have provided the additional guidance that it is "only applicable where you can prove the service is never likely to cost more thatn 0.50p."
Where the Traveline number is part of an advert of the Traveline service then the advice of the Advertising Standards Authority should be considered and points to charging information always being included.
OFCOM advise entries in telephone directories and other 'paid for' advertising space would fall within ASA/CAP definition of advertising.
ASA/CAP advice on 08 numbers arises from cases in 2005 and early 2006 and originally related to 0845 and 0870 numbers:
... if those numbers are featured in a marketing communication, the marcom should include pricing information that states the maximum cost or the maximum price per minute (ppm) of a call to BT customers: BT is the dominant call provider in the UK so information about costs from BT is meaningful to the largest readership. Also, it should make clear that the price of calls originating from non-BT call providers varies and, if space allows, state that callers can check the price with their phone company (Windsor Telecom plc, 4 Jan 2006; Langley Miniature Models, 6 April 2005)The ASA/CAP advice continues:
It would clearly be impracticable for directory owners to include those disclaimers in all display, semi-display and classified ads featuring 084 and 087 numbers. Although not considered by the ASA, CAP believes it would be acceptable for directories to include the disclaimers on every (or nearly every) page
Another source of guidance is to see what text PhonepayPlus would recommend if calls to Traveline were generally to be 50p or more, (they are generally much less than that). The PhonepayPlus Pricing Information help notes include these relevant points:
If you are showing the minimum amount of information about the cost of calls consider where you could put more details in a place that someone might expect to look for more information.
Please note that some of the details in these press released do not now fully conform to changes in this guidance.
Go back to traveline data
© Traveline 2010, Last updated: 5 February 2010